Our experiments do not address how subsets of particular presynaptic organelles, such as individual synaptic vesicles, may be specifically targeted by mTOR-dependent axonal macroautophagy. Clues might be offered if alternative modes of vesicle recycling are identified that

could partake in or avoid endocytic compartments that might fuse with AVs (Voglmaier et al., 2006). Starvation, injury, oxidative stress, toxins, including methamphetamine, and infection by neurotropic viruses trigger autophagy in neurons, which is further associated with protein aggregate-related disorders, including Huntington’s, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s diseases (Cheng et al., 2011, Koga et al., 2011, Larsen et al., 2002, Tallóczy et al., 2002 and Tooze

Doxorubicin and Schiavo, 2008). mTOR activity is regulated by multiple endogenous pathways involved in synaptic activity and stress, including tuberous sclerosis complex, Rheb, AKT, NF1, and PTEN (Malagelada et al., 2010). Alterations in mTOR activity are associated with neuropathological conditions such as epilepsy, tuberous sclerosis, and autism. Regulation of presynaptic function by mTOR activity and macroautophagy could thus contribute to manifestations of neurological disorders. Details Selisistat purchase of the experimental procedures can be found in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. We thank Ana Maria Cuervo, Zsolt Tallóczy, and Steven Siegelbaum for discussion. We thank Maksaaki Komatsu for providing the floxed Atg7 line. This work was funded by Udall Center of Excellence for Parkinson’s Disease Research, NIH DA07418 and DA10154, the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation, and the Picower Foundation. “
“Genetics is a major contributor to autism spectrum disorders. The genetic 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl component can be transmitted or

acquired through de novo (“new”) mutation. Analysis of the de novo mutations has demonstrated a large number of potential autism target genes (Gilman et al., 2011, Levy et al., 2011, Marshall et al., 2008, Pinto et al., 2010, Sanders et al., 2011 and Sebat et al., 2007). Previously cited studies have focused on large-scale de novo copy number events, either deletions or duplications. Because such events typically span many genes, discerning which of the genes in the target region, alone or in combination, contribute to the disorder becomes a matter of educated guessing or network analysis (Gilman et al., 2011). However, with high-throughput DNA sequencing we can readily search for new mutation in single genes by comparing children to both parents. Such mutation is fairly common, on the order of a hundred new mutations per child, with only a few—on the order of one per child—falling in coding regions (Awadalla et al., 2010 and Conrad et al., 2011).