0027). There was no significant difference on follow-up PAPs and biopsies between the two groups

(p = 0.4272). They showed an overall mean of 75% negative, 20% low-grade lesions, and 5% high-grade lesions/carcinoma in situ on follow-up. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates no significant effect of infections on the cytological changes diagnostic of ASCUS. The cytologist should make this diagnosis neglecting any background infections even when predominant. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel”
“Background\n\nThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines and the Quality Outcomes Framework require practitioners Selleckchem STI571 to use cardiovascular risk scores in assessments for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.\n\nAim\n\nTo explore GPs

selleck understanding and use of cardiovascular risk scores.\n\nDesign and setting\n\nQualitative study with purposive maximum variation sampling of 20 GPs working in Oxfordshire, UK.\n\nMethod\n\nThematic analysis of transcriptions of face-to-face interviews with participants undertaken by two individuals (one clinical, one non-clinical).\n\nResults\n\nGPs use cardiovascular risk scores primarily to guide treatment decisions by estimating the risk of a vascular event if the patient remains untreated. They expressed considerable uncertainty about how and whether to take account of existing drug treatment or other types of prior risk modification. They were also unclear about the choice between the older scores, based on

the Framingham study, and newer scores, such as QRISK((R)). There was substantial variation in opinion about whether scores could legitimately be used to illustrate to patients the change in risk as a result of treatment. learn more The overall impression was of considerable confusion.\n\nConclusion\n\nThe drive to estimate risk more precisely by qualifying guidance and promoting new scores based on partially-treated populations appears to have created unnecessary confusion for little obvious benefit. National guidance needs to be simplified, and, to be fit for purpose, better reflect the ways in which cardiovascular risk scores are currently used in general practice. Patients may be better served by simple advice to use a Framingham score and exercise more clinical judgement, explaining to patients the necessary imprecision of any individual estimate of risk.”
“Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether a comprehensive, yoga-based wellness program could positively affect multiple markers of health and wellness in an employee population.\n\nDesign: Self-selected employees who enrolled in a new wellness class were invited to participate in a yoga-based wellness program. Participants met six days per week (Monday through Saturday) at 5:10 AM. Sessions lasted for at least one hour, and the program was six weeks long.