, 1996, 1996; Spinnler & Tognoni, 1987) were within the normal range (see Table 1). Processes of acquisition of navigational information and re-orientation were assessed with the DDTDB, derived from tests used by Bianchini et al. (2010) in a previous study of DTD, based on theoretical models of normal development and normal navigation stages (Siegel & White, 1975; Wang & Spelke, 2002). The battery included three different categories MAPK Inhibitor Library of tasks. The first category assessed specific
domains such as visual spatial perception, visuospatial memory and visuospatial imagery (see Table 2). The second and third categories of tests assessed specific navigational abilities, respectively, in an experimental and an ecological environment (see Table 2). Dr. WAI’s performance on tests lacking standardization data was compared with that of male volunteers (C) matched
for age and years; the number of C varied from 20 to 5 in different tests. Dr. WAI’s and controls’ performances were compared HM781-36B mw by means of analysis developed by Crawford and Howell (1998; CH), using the computer program SINGLIMS.EXE. This analysis uses a modified t test described by Sokal and Rohlf (1995) and is the more suitable analysis to estimate the abnormality of the individual scores when the normative sample is small (that is less than 50 subjects). Results for each test (as well as size of C group) are described below and shown in Table 2. Assessment of Dr. WAI’s basic visuospatial abilities included tests of visuospatial perception (Visual Object Spatial Perception Battery, Benton’s Facial Recognition Test), visuospatial memory (Corsi Block Tapping Test: Span and Supraspan), and visuospatial imagery (Memory of buildings, Letter Inspection Test, Mental Rotation Test, Rucaparib purchase Generation of imagery from long-term memory as Map drawing of current home) (see Tables 1 and 2). Only tests not commonly used in clinical practice are described below. On the Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBT; Corsi,
1972), Dr. WAI had a normal span, as well as normal Supra-span learning and delayed recall when compared with a group of five controls. His performance in object and space perception (Visual Object Spatial Perception Battery, Warrington & James, 1991) and face recognition (Benton’s Facial Recognition Test, Benton, Van Allen, Hamsher, & Levin, 1975) was well within the normal range (see Table 1). Topographical abilities involve some specific aspects of cognition, such as recognizing landmarks and scenes and describing and drawing a map of a familiar environment, which rely on visual imagery abilities (Farah, 1989; Riddoch & Humphreys, 1989). As in Bianchini et al.’s (2010) study, we referred to Kosslyn’s model (2005) in Dr. WAI’s assessment, to evaluate processes of generation, inspection, and transformation of visual mental images.