, 2007a, Cohen Kadosh et al., 2007b and Cohen Kadosh et al., 2010). Therefore, it was quite astonishing to discover its total absence
in synesthetic individuals. How can this lack of SiCE be explained? We presume that it might be a matter of shortage in mental resources. In an incompatible condition, the numbers do not match the synesthete’s own conscious representation. This conflict between the mental representation and the concrete visualization necessitates mentally rotating or replacing the numbers’ display to fit their location on the synesthetic number form. This process, which is undoubtedly time and energy consuming, leaves little resources (if any) for processing the numbers’ values. This explanation corroborates previous studies that showed how task difficulty this website (e.g., perceptual load) can influence performance in general and automatic processing in particular when attentional resources were consumed by high load task (for review see Lavie, 2005 and Mattingley et al., 2006). Continuing this line of thought, we suggest two alternatives: One possibility is that synesthetes did perceive the semantic meaning of the numbers to some extent (otherwise there would have been no mistakes at all in this condition), however, the incompatible presentation of the numbers was too difficult for achieving complete automatic processing of the numerical values.
Examination of the RT results along with the ER results in physical judgments of the horizontal task support this suggestion, showing that
a conflict between 4-Aminobutyrate aminotransferase the relevant and irrelevant dimensions was evident in the ER measures but did not fully GSI-IX purchase evolve to be manifested also in terms of response time. Alternatively, it is also possible that when numbers were presented in a “”wrong”" order, synesthetes did not perceive them as symbols that entailed numerical values but rather as asemantic, meaningless forms. After debriefing, synesthete ES (who has a bottom to top number form) described her insights from the experiment as follows: “”When the numbers are ordered incorrectly, each number stands on its own and is not perceived as a part of the numerical sequence, therefore it is not confusing when the digit does not correspond to the physical size”". If this is correct, it would not be farfetched to suggest that for synesthetes, the number-line incompatible condition resembles the neutral condition in the sense that the irrelevant information does not interfere with the relevant information. In the same vein of thought, the congruent condition loses its advantage as a facilitator. Indeed, a closer examination of the facilitation (i.e., neutral RT minus congruent RT) and interference (i.e., incongruent RT minus neutral RT) patterns in the physical block of the vertical task revealed that in the incompatible condition both the interference and facilitation components were eliminated (see Fig. 1B).