Pastalkova and colleagues (2008) suggested that time is represented by the fact that cells fire in a self-organized sequence. After an initial kick, a set of recurrently connected cells begins a pattern of activation
that spreads from one cell to another. In this way, the elapsed time could be read out by the state of the network, rather than in the activity of a single pacemaker or clock. A critical question remains unresolved in all prior studies of time cells: can the time ALK inhibitor cell phenomenon be explained by simpler mechanisms, such as continuous changes in sensory stimulation or behavior, including path integration? In the earlier studies, the rat was either running in a running wheel or free to move on a small platform, leaving many variables uncontrolled. In this issue, Kraus et al. (2013) use a new behavioral paradigm to examine whether the time cells are influenced by path integration. In Kraus et al. (2013)’s experimental design, a rat ran through a modified version of the classic alternating T-maze. In the stem part of the maze, where the rat must hold in working memory whether to go right or left, the rat was required to run on a treadmill. In some trials, the rats ran for a prescribed amount of time (“time-fixed”), while in others they ran for a prescribed distance (“distance-fixed”). Because the treadmill could be run at different
speeds every trial, Kraus et al. (2013) were then able to consider whether the cells more tightly locked to time or distance Onalespib (Figure 1). Time and distance are inherently linked (the farther you run, the longer
it will take), but the paradigm provides Chlormezanone enough of a dissociation between them to provide a useful test. Kraus et al. (2013) found that firing of most of the cells on the treadmill were best explained by a combination of time and distance, but critically, a modest number of cells (8% of the cells that were active on the treadmill) responded exclusively to time and not distance. These data suggest that at least a subset of time cells may in fact represent time objectively, independently of distance traveled. We still have much to learn about time cells. One fundamental issue is whether time cells are always time cells or if they can change to place cells in other contexts. Here Kraus et al. (2013) provide a tantalizing hint. Their main analyses focused on the period in which the rat ran on the treadmill, but they also examined the activity of those cells on other portions of the maze. Some pure time cells in the treadmill running also had what looked like pure place fields in other parts of the maze, suggesting that time cells are not predetermined to always be time cells and can even switch to another cell type within the same session. More detailed analyses are required, but based on these results, it seems that time cells, like many odor cells (Wood et al.