3–10.1 mg and 1.0–3.1 mg in adults and children, respectively). This confirms the assumptions made by the EFSA and the WHO that the established thresholds are regularly exceeded, in particular in children—cf. above. In addition, the CHMP based its assessment of chronic aluminium toxicity on pharmacovigilance databases (reports of serious and non-serious adverse events from the register of spontaneous reports or from clinical studies)
from Germany from 1988 to 2008 (7638 reactions were analysed). Due to the low number of potential aluminium-associated side effects reported (except for the known granulomas), the CHMP arrived at the conclusion that there are no safety concerns. To what extent such a database is suitable to detect associations between SCIT and the development of diseases, which could have a latency period, remains to be seen. In their conclusion, the Safety Working Party to the CHMP places the cumulative aluminium JNJ-26481585 concentration dose of 12 mg aluminium absorbed from a 3-year SCIT (0.5 mg per injection, 6-week interval = 4 mg per year × 3 years of therapy) in the context of an adult’s lifelong cumulative dose of 165–505 mg as “safe oral dietary intake (TWI)”. Thus, the contribution of such an SCIT to the lifelong cumulative total dose is calculated as being fewer than
10%. In connection with the estimation on the basis of the side effects database, the CHMP draws the conclusion that there is no risk from aluminium in SCIT [65]. It is general practice Ku-0059436 solubility dmso in toxicology to consider maximal values (within a licensed indication) of the substance in question. The final assessment of the CHMP does not seem to be based on a similar rationale and it ignored up-titration period(s)
completely. If 1.14 mg (top aluminium-adjuvant dose) is considered and 6-week intervals, then the human body burden of aluminium totals 27.36 mg (1.14 mg × 8 × 3 years). before If the maintenance dose were based on monthly (cf. above) instead of the 6-week intervals, this amounts to 41.04 mg (1.14 mg × 12 × 3 years) and still would not include up-titration. Over the course of their lives, many allergic patients will receive treatments for several allergens—some lifelong (cf. above). The cumulative dose of aluminium from immunotherapy used as basis by the CHMP does not appear to reflect the amount of exposure a patient will receive in practice. In addition to this, it was compared to dietary intake (i.e. the immunotherapy cumulative dose being <10% of this) – a route of administration with a totally different adsorption rate. This is not only misleading but a fundamental mistake. In January 2014 the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) published its opinion regarding aluminium in SCIT “Sicherheitsbewertung von Aluminium in Therapieallergenen” [66]. Within this document, the German regulatory authority essentially repeats conclusions drawn from the CHMP in 2010 [65].