4 %and smaller
p-values for gender (p=0.0008), IFNL4 rs12979860 genotype (ptrend=0.02) and race (p=0.03). Conclusion: The very high SVR rates observed among certain subgroups of patients treated for 8 weeks with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir support conducting shorter trials of this regimen in selected patients. A briefer course of therapy could yield substantial healthcare savings; assuming treatment costs of $1000/day, every 100,000 patients treated with ledipas-vir/sofosbuvir for two fewer weeks (i.e., 6 weeks rather than 8 weeks) would reduce healthcare costs by $1.4 billion dollars. Disclosures: Thomas R. O’Brien – Patent Held/Filed: National Cancer Institute The following people have nothing to disclose: Krystle A. Kuhs, Ruth M. Pfeiffer Background: The new oral single tablet regimen of LDV/SOF has been shown to have excellent efficacy and tolerability Palbociclib nmr in treatment-naive (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) patients with HCV GT1. A decision-analytic model evaluated the health outcomes of LDV/SOF compared with
current recommended options, including SOF with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (PR) at 12 weeks, simeprevir (SMV) with PR at 24-48 weeks, and no treatment. NVP-AUY922 supplier Methods: The analysis modeled cohorts of 10,000 HCV TN or TE GT1 patients with an average age of 52 and varying level of fibrosis from a US third party payer perspective for a lifetime horizon. LDV/SOF for 8 weeks was compared to LDV/SOF for 12 weeks, SOF+PR for 12 weeks, SMV+PR for 12 weeks (+PR for 12-36 weeks per prescribing Selleck Alectinib information), and no treatment.
Sustained viro-logic response (SVR) (listed in Table 1) and adverse rates were based on phase III clinical trials Transition probabilities and utility were based on literature review, public sources, and consensus by a panel of 4 hepatologists. Results: LDV/SOF regimen for 8-or-12 weeks resulted in better health outcomes compared with SOF+PR, SMV+PR, and no treatment, with the lowest number of liver-related complications. Patients on LDV/ SOF regimens also demonstrated the highest life year gains and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to other comparator regimens, among TN and TE patients. Conclusions: Compared to current recommended options, LDV/SOF demonstrated better overall health outcomes. Large discrepancies in efficacy, side effects, and adherence rates have been reported for currently available regimens between real-world and clinical trial settings. Additional real-world analyses are necessary to determine the potential impact of the greater expected real-world differences between LDV/SOF regimen and other available therapies. Disclosures: Sammy Saab – Advisory Committees or Review Panels: BMS, Gilead, Merck, Genentech; Grant/Research Support: Merck, Gilead; Speaking and Teaching: BMS, Gilead, Merck, Genentech, Salix, Onyx, Bayer, Janssen; Stock Shareholder: Salix, Johnson and Johnson, BMS, Gilead Aijaz Ahmed – Consulting: BMS, Gilead, Vertex, Genentech, Onyxx Stuart C.