693, P = 0.001). Additionally, two questions included in selleck the musical background questionnaire were designed to probe the contribution of factors other than musical training to potential group differences. Such factors were the amount of exposure to music not directly related to training and experience with video games, with the latter having a potential to increase

the speed of responses (Dye et al., 2009). To evaluate group differences in relation to the above factors, we asked the following questions: (1) How many hours a week do you listen to music? (2) How many hours a week do you play video games? The two groups did not differ on either factor (listening to music, t34 = 0.851, P = 0.401; playing video games, t34 = −0.515, P = 0.61). A summary of ACC and RT measures for both groups is shown in Table 3. In both musicians and non-musicians deviant sounds were associated with significantly lower ACC and longer RT compared with standard sounds, thus confirming that timbre changes were in fact distracting: RT F1,34 = 161.918, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.826; ACC F1,34 = 43.918, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.564. With regard to ACC, there was a significant effect of group, with

musicians performing overall more accurately (F1,34 = 10.661, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.239). A group by sound type (voice, music) by stimulus type (standard, deviant) interaction showed a trend toward significance (F1,34 = 3.372, P = 0.075, ηp2 = 0.09), with Osimertinib order musicians being equally accurate when classifying either

musical or vocal deviants (F1,18 < 1), but with non-musicians being significantly less accurate when classifying music deviants compared with voice deviants (F1,16 = 9.971, P < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.384). Additionally, the naturalness (NAT, ROT) by sound type (voice, music) interaction was also significant (F1,34 = 7.491, P = 0.01, ηp2 = 0.181) due to the fact that in the NAT condition participants were overall more accurate when classifying vocal sounds compared with musical sounds (F1,36 = 17.624, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.335). This difference was, however, absent in the ROT condition (F1,36 < 1). We also calculated a difference in accuracy between standards and deviants (see Table 3). ADAM7 This measure shows the degree of impairment at doing the duration discrimination task as a result of timbre change. The group difference was marginally significant (F1,34 = 3.462, P = 0.071, ηp2 = 0.092), with musicians’ temporal discrimination accuracy being impaired to a lesser degree by the irrelevant timbre change. In addition, the group by sound type (voice, music) interaction also trended toward significance (F1,34 = 3.372, P = 0.075, ηp2 = 0.09). Follow-up analyses revealed that musicians were distracted to the same degree by vocal and musical timbre changes (F1,18 < 1), while non-musicians found musical timbre changes more distracting (F1,16 = 7.64, P = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.323).