92 (SE = 0.07) and 0.75 (SE = 0.06), respectively. Whereas the pretreatment ED OER(M) was higher than the stable patient OER(M) (P = .001), the posttreatment ED OER(M) was not significantly different from the stable patient measurement (P = .271).\n\nConclusions: Oxygen extraction in acute HF is significantly increased, but approaches values found in the stable HF population after ED treatment. The OER(M) may deserve closer examination as a possible goal-directed variable in the treatment of acute HF. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights

reserved.”
“Very high selleck chemical resolution (VHR) images are a valuable information source to estimate land cover area and land cover change. When full coverage of a region with VHR images Compound C datasheet is not affordable, a sample of images can be considered. Square grids provide a practical

sampling frame for VHR images. When using a land cover map as pseudo-truth, the sampling variance is easily assessed but may be overestimated if the land cover map has a coarse resolution. To estimate the potential sampling variance of a cluster sampling scheme, we propose a method based on intra-cluster correlation (ICC) computed from a correlogram. The ‘equivalent number of points’ is a useful indicator to quantify cost-efficiency of sites of a given size. We obtained poor efficiency results for area estimation of major land cover types in the European Union (EU) with a sample of 10 km x 10 km sites, but results are more encouraging for classes with a more scattered layout or for land cover change.”
“Background: Both patient- and physician-centered characteristics may influence disease classification of fibromyalgia (FM).\n\nObjective: This study assessed the diagnostic criteria for FM and how rheurnatologists use these criteria in clinical practice.\n\nMethods: Practicing rheurnatologists were surveyed. Participants were asked to read a brief case description of a patient with FM and then to select those criteria most important GW4869 supplier to them for confirming the diagnosis. Case studies of either male or female patients were randomly assigned. Data were analyzed using a random forests classification

analysis to abstract the strongest variables for distinguishing disease classification-in this assessment, stratified by gender of the case study.\n\nResults: A total of 61 surveys were analyzed. Four rheurnatologists (6.6%) chose the 2 (and only the 2) criteria for FM classification (tender points and widespread pain) proposed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The candidate diagnostic criteria discriminating between rheurnatologists (when stratified by gender of the case study) consisted of (1) tender points, (2) normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate, (3) normal thyroid tests, (4) fatigue, and (5) poor quality of sleep. Of these, the criterion of tender points was chosen by rheumatologists statistically more frequently for male patients (P = 0.047).