Blood cultures remained negative. Abdominal CT scan revealed a focal bilobate lesion measuring 6 cm. Serologic tests for detection of anti-amebic antibodies with LAT, IHAT, and electrosyneresis (ES) were negative. IFAT was found slightly positive: 1 : 80 (threshold at 1 : 80)

in a laboratory and 1 : 300 (threshold at 1 : 150) in a reference center. Because of undetermined etiology, drainage of the liver abscess was required. Microscopic examination of the hematic aspiration fluid remained negative whereas histological examination of the liver fragment taken during the aspiration revealed amebae in the abscess capsule leading to the diagnosis of ALA. Clinical and biologic outcomes were good selleck products after 20 days of treatment with metronidazole. The serology was followed JAK cancer up for 4 months: LAT, IHA, and ES remained

negative, IFAT result was twice the threshold on day 7, 14, and 37 and negative on the fourth month. The two cases reported here emphasize the difficulties in diagnosing the etiology of a liver abscess. Therefore, at the presentation of a patient with liver abcess, both PLA and ALA should be considered according to the patient’s clinical parameters. Furthermore, when no liver abscess puncture is performed the treatment must also cover anaerobes, and therefore metronidazole was used which is efficient against E histolytica. In industrialized nations where amebiasis is not endemic, serologic tests are Ergoloid essential for the diagnosis of ALA. Current methods include IFAT, IHAT, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE), ES, and LAT. If IFAT, IHAT, ELISA, CIE, and ES are time-consuming methods requiring trained personnel and specialized equipment, LAT is a bedside test, easy to perform and gives rapid results (5 minutes). Therefore, LAT is often used in first-line in an emergency context. IFAT uses whole antigen whereas other tests use soluble antigens. Most of the tests are marketed, others are home made. Usually, the antigens come from cultivated axenic strains whereas recombinant

proteins are exceptionally used. Altogether, for the diagnosis of liver abscesses, amebic serology is considered as highly sensitive (>94%) and highly specific (>95%).[1] In the literature, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of serologic tests used to diagnose amebiasis are similar whatever the method used. However, the following study limitations must be emphasized: retrospective studies on serum bank, lack of gold standard, and high pre-test probability. Thus, results of positive and negative predictive values are not very reliable data. Limits of amebic serology in ALA diagnosis exist. False positives decrease specificity and positive predictive value. It has been frequently observed that current serologic tests measure long-persisting antibodies in amebiasis.