Dysfunction in the integration and arbitration of approach and avoidance valuations would likely relate to OFC and/or mPFC dysfunction. The OFC is the prefrontal region most implicated in integrating information concerning various stimuli and Selleckchem Wortmannin outcome characteristics.31 Rolls and Grabenhorst49 have suggested that reinforcers must have “approximately equal Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical potency at their maximal value to ensure that different rewards are chosen sometimes, and that behavior is not always directed towards a few superpotent specific rewards.”

We propose that the OFC may be responsible for scaling signals from various Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical brain regions in order to enable comparisons to be made between them. By doing so, the OFC can then produce a signal that accurately reflects the net value of each potential outcome, biasing the system accordingly towards one behavior or another, and ensuring that responses represent a balance between approach- and avoidance-motivated signals. Attenuated OFC activation or a weakening in the correlation between OFC and limbic/striatal activation in anxiety disorders would suggest this is

a primary site of approach-avoidance dysfunction, whereas enhanced OFC activation would most Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical likely represent attempts to compensate for dysfunction in other regions within the proposed cortico-striatal-limbic system. The hypotheses we set forth concerning OFC and mPFC, amygdala, insula, or striatal dysfunction in approach-avoidance processes in anxiety disorders can be examined on three different levels. First, specific behavioral Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical experiments using Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical decision-making paradigms can

be used to disentangle effects of approach and avoidance from that of inefficient arbitration. For example, dysfunctions of approach-avoidance conflict may be examined during risk-related decision-making paradigms – particularly those modified to include affective-related outcomes (such as that used by Talmi et al157). Concurrent examination regarding the influence of effort and delay characteristics could be used to more fully delineate decision-making behavior. others Second, functional neuroimaging can be used to determine whether the proposed segregation between approach and avoidance neural substrates and their relative dysfunction can be supported experimentally. In particular, neuroimaging research could utilize the framework of approach-avoidance conflict and decision making to more specifically delineate the role such dysfunction plays in determining the behavioral responses that are an integral part of anxiety disorders.