Experiencing difficulty obtaining the method contributes to high rates of discontinuation. (Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:330-6) DOI: http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827e5898″
“BACKGROUND: Bio-ethanol production from renewable sources, such as sugar cane, makes it a biofuel that is both renewable and environmentally friendly. One of the strategies to reduce production costs and to make ethanol fuel economically competitive with fossil fuels could be the use of wild yeast with osmotolerance, ethanol resistance and low nutritional requirements. The aim
of this work was to investigate the kinetics of ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae ITV-01 yeast strain in a batch system at different glucose and ethanol concentrations, pH values Selleck CT99021 and temperature in order to determine the optimum fermentation
conditions.
RESULTS: This strain showed osmotolerance P5091 chemical structure (its specific growth rate (mu(max)) remained unchanged at glucose concentrations between 100 and 200 g L(-1)) as well as ethanol resistance (it was able to grow at 10% v/v ethanol). Activation energy (Ea) and Q(10) values calculated at temperatures between 27 and 39 degrees C, pH 3.5, was 15.6 kcal mol(-1) (with a pre-exponential factor of 3.8 x 10(12) h(-1) (R(2) = 0.94)) and 3.93 respectively, indicating that this system is biologically limited.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal conditions for ethanol production were pH 3.5, 30 degrees C and initial glucose concentration 150 g L(-1). In this SYN-117 supplier case, a maximum ethanol concentration of 58.4 g L(-1), ethanol productivity of 1.8 g L(-1) h(-1) and ethanol yield of 0.41 g g(-1) were obtained. (C) 2010 Society of Chemical Industry”
“OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer is the most common solid carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy; obviously, pregnancy adds complexity to treatment recommendations. We synthesized all available data and evaluated the efficacy and safety of the administration of platinum derivatives during pregnancy in cervical cancer.
DATA SOURCES: Eligible articles were identified by a search of MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases
for the period up to September 7, 2012; the algorithm comprised a predefined combination of the terms “”cervical,”" “”cancer,”" “”cisplatin,”" carboplatin,”" and “”pregnancy.”"
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators, working independently, searched the literature and extracted data from all studies that examined the efficacy and safety of platinum derivatives administered during pregnancy in cervical cancer. All cases in which therapeutic abortion was scheduled were excluded. Moreover, quantitative synthesis of the published articles was performed.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Overall, 24 studies (48 pregnancies, 48 newborns [one twin pregnancy and one miscarriage]) were eligible.