Further research also confirmed that miR-155 may participate in the LPS-induced negative feedback regulation through inhibition of FADD, IKKϵ, and Ripk1 gene expression.[21] www.selleckchem.com/products/3-methyladenine.html This finding suggests that miR-155 plays a negative regulatory role in the LPS-mediated immune response. On the other hand, miR-155 can also promote the translation of TNF-α, which implies the underlying functional complexity of miR-155 in immune

regulation.[22] In this study, it was demonstrated that in contrast to miR-146a and miR-155, miR-451 was significantly downregulated following xenotransplantation. This indicates that miR-451 has a different regulatory effect from miR-146a and miR-155 in the process of xenograft rejection. Some studies have reported that miR-451, regulated by GATA-1,[23] plays a key role in the maturation of red blood cells through the regulation of its target gene GATA-2.[24] Rasmussen et al.[25] also found that a miR-451 deficiency would delay erythroblast maturation, resulting in erythroid hyperplasia, splenomegaly, and anemia. In addition, Zhang et al.[26] have found that overexpression of miR-451 can also provide protection against ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiomyocyte death and augment cardiomyocyte survival. In www.selleckchem.com/products/OSI-906.html this view, we speculate that the formation of intravascular thrombosis, as the critical factor affecting heart

graft survival, is closely related to the downregulation of miR-451 at the endpoint of rejection. It has also been reported that Tollip is a predicted target gene

of miR-451 and a ubiquitin-binding protein that can interact with some components of the TLR signaling—an important inflammatory signaling regulatory factor that is closely related to Farnesyltransferase the IL-1R and IRAK-1 activation.[27] Recently, Rebl et al.[28] found that Tollip is a negative regulator of TLR signaling. As described above, although there is a negative regulatory mechanism between miR-146a/miR-155 and TLR that plays an important role in the initiation of the immune response and pathogen recognition, we speculate that the changes of miR-451 level may facilitate the process of immune response in xenografting. In summary, at both 24 hours and at the endpoint of rejection following mouse-to-rat cardiac xenografting, 31 intragraft expressed miRNAs that may be associated with the regulation of immune responses following xenotransplantation were detected. This study has expanded our knowledge regarding the role of miRNAs in xenograft rejection, and the evidence generated deserves further investigation for the future development of clinically applicable strategies in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of xenograft rejection. The authors thank Yujie Qiu, Na Zhao, Hui Liang, and Yiling Hsu for technical support.