MICs were interpreted according to the breakpoints established by CLSI [16], except for sulbactam and rifampicin, for which breakpoints from the French Society for Microbiology were used (for sulbactam, ≤8 mg/L for susceptible; for rifampicin, ≤8 μg/ml for susceptible and <16 mg/L for resistant) [17]. Resistance to imipenem or meropenem was defined as carbapenem resistance. Detection of carbapenemase-encoding genes Genes encoding Class A carbapenemases (bla GES and bla KPC), Class B metallo-β-lactamases (bla IMP, bla VIM, bla SPM, bla GIM, bla SIM and bla NDM) or Class D OXA-type carbapenemases (bla OXA-51, bla OXA-23, bla OXA-24, bla OXA-58 and bla OXA-143) were screened as described previously [18–22].
Purified amplicons were sequenced in both Selleck VS-4718 directions using an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, United Kingdom). Similarity searches were carried out using BLAST programs (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Strain GDC-0994 chemical structure typing PFGE was employed to determine clonal relatedness of the isolates and was performed as described previously [12]. PFGE band patterns were analyzed using the BioNumerics software, version 6.6.4.0 (Applied Maths, St-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Pulsotypes were defined as isolates with PFGE band patterns of 80% similarity or above [23]. All A. baumannii isolates were subjected to MLST targeting seven housekeeping
BX-795 genes, gltA, gyrB, gdhB, recA, cpn60, gpi and rpoD[24]. As primers used previously were unable to amplify the gdhB and gpi alleles for some isolates [9, 24, 25], new primers were therefore designed for gdhB (gdhBxF1: ATTGGTTGCTGCCGAATAGT; gdhBxR1: TATGGGGGCCAGATAATCAA) and gpi (gpi-F2: AAAATCCATGCTGGGCAATA; gpi-R2: CCGAGTAATGCCATGAGAAC) genes [24]. New STs were deposited in the Acinetobacter MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/abaumannii/).
eBURST (version 3, http://eburst.mlst.net/) Gemcitabine was used to assign STs to CCs, which were defined for those sharing identical alleles at six of seven loci. CCs were named according to the number of the predicted founder ST except for CC92, which has been well defined in literature. If no founder ST was predicted by eBURST, the CC was named by the first ST assigned. Isolates with new STs and isolate d34, of which ST could not be determined using the pubmlst scheme, were also subjected to MLST using the Pasteur scheme [26]. New STs determined using the Pasteur scheme have also been deposited into the database (http://www.pasteur.fr/mlst/Abaumannii.html). Acknowledgments This work was partially supported by a grant from China US Collaborative Program on Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases and by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 81101293). References 1. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL: Acinetobacter baumannii : emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2008, 21:538–582.PubMedCrossRef 2.