Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently prescribed to reduce gastric and duodenal injury caused in high-risk patients taking NSAIDs. However, scarce information is available concerning the effects of PPIs on intestinal damage induced by NSAIDs, and the suppression of gastric acid secretion by PPIs is hard to provide any protection against the damage caused by NSAIDs in the small intestine. The present study was designed to examine the effects of intragastric treatment of two PPIs widely used in clinical buy Silmitasertib practice, namely omeprazole and pantoprazole, on the intestinal damage induced by administration of diclofenac in rat. Male SD rats were treated with omeprazole or pantoprazole
for 9 days, with concomitant treatment with anti-inflammatory doses of diclofenac on the final 5 days. The anatomical lesion, villous height, the thickness, and the section area of small intestine were quantitatively analyzed. The change of ultrastructural organization was
observed. Endotoxin level in blood was measured by photometry. Epidermal growth factor was observed by immunohistochemistry. Omeprazole and pantoprazole didn’t decrease the macroscopic and histologic damage induced by diclofenac in the rat’s small intestine. In the two PPI groups, villous height was (89.6 +/- A 11.8 and 92.6 +/- A 19.3 mu m) lower Rabusertib order than which of the control group (P < 0.05). The thickness became thinning, and the section area became small. LPS levels in the portal blood of omeprazole and
pantoprazole were (4.36 +/- A 1.26 and 4.25 +/- A 1.17 EU/ml), significantly higher than in controls (P < 0.05). The EFG of PPI group descended significantly compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Omeprazole and pantoprazole cannot protect the small intestine from the damage induced by diclofenac in the conscious rat. PPIs cannot repair NSAID-induced intestinal damage at least in part because of significant lesion in mechanical barrier function and reduction in epidermal growth factor.”
“The aim of this multicentre study is to investigate the incidence and risk factors for falls in ambulatory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. One hundred and eighty-five ambulatory RA patients who have been followed up in 3 different centres were included in study. Patients were www.selleck.cn/products/torin-1.html a part of Turkish League Against Rheumatism-Follow-up Program. All patients were evaluated at the baseline in terms of demographic features, falls history in the last year, disease-specific characteristics and co-morbidities. Functional status was evaluated by chair stand test with five repetitions and heel-toe walking. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP values were measured. Study patients were followed by the three monthly visits during a year. Patients were asked to fill the fall diary and/or call the doctor when a fall happens. The features of falls were recorded to the files at the time of the fall. The mean age was 56.7 +/- A 11.4 years.