Role of Bax expression and mitochondria in silibinin-induced cell death Since numerous death signals converge on mitochondria through the activation of this website pro-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family such as Bax [24], calpain activation
may induce the silibinin-induced cell death through a Bax-dependent pathway. To test this possibility, the effect of silibinin on Bax expression was examined. Silibinin increased Bax expression after 3 h of treatment, which was blocked by the calpain inhibitor (Figure 3). Figure 3 Effect of silibinin on Bax expression. Cells were exposed to 30 μM silibinin for various times and Bax expression was estimated by Western blot analysis. Representative ( A ) and quantitative (B) results of four independent experiments. ( C ) Cells were exposed to 30 μM silibinin for 24 h in the presence or JNK inhibitor library absence of 0.5 μM calpain inhibitor (CHO) and Bax expression was estimated by Western blot analysis. The increase in Bax Geneticin expression may cause disruption of △ψm to induce cell death. To test the possibility, cells were exposed to silibinin and the △ψm
was measured using the fluorescence dye. After silibinin treatment, disruption of △ψm was observed as evidenced by an increase in the proportion of cells with lower fluorescence intensity (Figure 4A). The reduction in △ψm was observed after 3 h of silibinin treatment and remained unchanged even after 12 h (Figure 4B). Figure 4 Effect of silibinin on mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). Cells were exposed to 30 μM silibinin for 6 h (A) and various times (B). The MMP was estimated by the uptake of a membrane potential-sensitive fluorescence dye DiCO6(3). The fluorescence intensity was analyzed using FACS analysis. Data in (B) are mean ± SEM of three independent PDK4 experiments performed in duplicate. *p < 0.05 compared with control. (C) Effect of inhibitors of calpain and PKC and antioxidant on silibinin-induced disruption of MMP. Cells were exposed to 30 μM silibinin for 6 h in the presence
or absence of 0.5 μM calpain inhibitor (CHO), 1 μM GF 109203X (GF), 1 μM rottlerin (Ro), and 800 units/ml catalase (Cat). The MMP was measured as described above. Data are mean ± SEM of four independent experiments performed in duplicate. *p < 0.05 compared with silibinin alone. Disruption of △ψm by silibinin may be associated with ROS generation. To test the possibility, cells were exposed to silibinin in the presence of the antioxidant catalase and △ψm was measured. Figure 4C shows that the silibinin-induced reduction in △ψm was blocked by catalase, suggesting that the △ψm disruption by silibinin is mediated by ROS generation. As shown above, since the silibinin-induced ROS generation was blocked by inhibitors of calpain and PKC, the silibinin-induced disruption of △ψm would be prevented by these inhibitors. As expected, the reduction in △ψm was blocked by Z-Leu-Leu-CHO, GF 109203X, and rottlerin, with similar potency to that by catalase (Figure 4C).