Since improvements in sanitation and hygiene will unlikely decrease the incidence of rotavirus infection, vaccination offers the main hope of reducing global rotavirus deaths [3]. After successful clinical trials of the rotavirus

vaccines Rotarix™ (GSK Biologicals, Belgium) and RotaTeq™ (Merck & Co., USA) in Europe and the Americas [4] and [5], the World Modulators Health Organization (WHO) recommended that rotavirus vaccines should be included into national immunization programmes in regions where efficacy data suggested that there would be a significant public health impact [6] and [7]. The question remained as to how both rotavirus vaccines would perform in the world’s poorest countries in Asia and Africa [3]. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of Rotarix™ conducted in Malawi and South Africa was completed in 2008, and demonstrated Ku-0059436 cost a vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis of 61.2% in the combined study populations [8]. While the efficacy in Malawi was 49.5%, 6.6 episodes of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis were prevented per 100 infant-years by vaccination, indicating a significant potential this website public health impact [8]. Thus, when considered together with other data from resource-poor settings, WHO recommended the inclusion of

rotavirus vaccine into all national childhood immunization programmes, and the introduction of rotavirus vaccine was strongly recommended in countries where diarrhoea is responsible for ≥10% of mortality among children

less than 5 years of age [9]. Nevertheless, the efficacy of Rotarix™ in Malawi (49.5%) was less than had been previously documented in other settings and below that observed in South Africa (76.9%). Rotavirus strain diversity is known to be greater in many developing countries than reported in industrialized countries and has been postulated as a factor that could adversely impact on vaccine performance [10] and [11]. Rotavirus is a segmented double-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the family Reoviridae, and its G and P serotypes are defined by the antigenicity of the outer capsid neutralisation proteins, VP7 and VP4, respectively. These serotypes are often referred to as G and P genotypes, respectively, for molecular assays are more commonly used for their determination Adenosine than are serologic assays. Recently, genotype classification has been expanded to include all 11 genome segments; for example, the genotypes of the middle capsid protein (VP6) and the viral enterotoxin (NSP4) are now referred to as I genotype and E genotype, respectively [12]. In Malawi, an extensive diversity of G and P genotypes was identified during the clinical trial; three-quarters of strains belonged to G12P[6] (27%), G8P[4] (24%) and G9P[8] (24%), with only 13% of strains being G1P[8], the homotypic genotype with respect to the RIX4414 strain that is contained in Rotarix™ [8].