The autonomous replication of the pMyBK1 derivatives learn more in these species was confirmed by plasmid purification and back-transformation of E. coli with the purified plasmids. Transformation of Mmc with pCM-K3/4 also yielded many tetracycline resistant transformants, but no free plasmid could

be detected despite the positive PCR amplification of CDSB. These results suggest an integration of the pMyBK1 derivative into the host chromosome of this species, as it has been previously described for oriC plasmids [55]. Attempts to transform M. mycoides subsp. mycoides or Spiroplasma citri with pCM-K3 repeatedly failed. Interestingly, we also showed that pMyBK1 not only replicated in various mycoplasma species but was also able to express heterologous genes. The spiralin gene encoding the major surface protein of S. citri was inserted into the EcoRI site of pCM-K3 and the resulting plasmid pCM-K3-spi (Figure 2A) was successfully introduced into M. yeatsii GIH TS and Mcc California Kid. Expression of spiralin by the transformants was demonstrated by immunoblotting

(Additional file 6: Figure S3 for Mcc transformants, data not shown for M. yeatsii transformants). These results Dinaciclib molecular weight confirm and extend recently published results [25] indicating that pMyBK1 derivatives can be used as expression vectors in mycoplasma species of veterinary importance. General phylogeny of Rep sequences from mycoplasma plasmids Based on the availability of 25 Rep sequences of mycoplasma plasmids (Additional file 3: Table S3), it was possible to address how these sequences cluster in the PF299 supplier Phylogenetic tree constructed with a set of sequences including representatives of RCR plasmids from both Mollicutes and Firmicutes mafosfamide (Figure 6). A set of 62 amino acids sequence corresponding to the replication protein of 25 mycoplasma plasmids and of 37 representatives of the major RCR plasmid families, including those of the phytoplasma plasmids was selected for constructing

the phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed that, except for pMyBK1, all mycoplasma plasmids could be grouped within the pMV158 family (Figure 6). This result is consistent with the prediction, in these Rep sequences, of a Rep2 domain typical of this plasmid family. Yet, mycoplasma plasmids do not form a single, coherent group in this family but instead cluster into two distinct branches designated as groups 1 and 2. Rep proteins from groups 1 and 2 share only limited similarities and, the most divergent members in these groups are more distant between each other than they are from the streptococcal pMV158. Group 1 consists of highly similar proteins (identity ranging from 88 to 100%) and includes Rep proteins from Mmc and Mcc plasmids. Conversely, group 2 is more heterogeneous and includes Rep proteins from M. leachii, M. yeatsii, M. cottewii, Mmc and Mcc plasmids. Further phylogenetic analyses showed that group 2 could be split into two statistically-supported subgroups (2A and 2B).