The more important ones include the quantitative methods of measuring vertebral body height on radiographs [8, 9], as well as the semi-quantitative method proposed

by Genant et BIBW2992 cell line al. [10]. These assessments use different cut-offs to define the presence of a vertebral fracture, and the reference for comparison of vertebral height could either be the individual’s adjacent vertebral body or the mean of a reference population. These variations affected the sensitivity and specificity of the assessments resulting in high false-negative and false-positive rates and also created a considerable discordance of results in assessing the prevalence and incidence of vertebral CFTRinh-172 solubility dmso fractures [11–13]. Also, vertebral fractures can also be confused with normal variants in vertebral shape or other end-plate deformities caused by other diseases Therefore, the exclusion of other vertebral deformities in order to

make a correct diagnosis of vertebral fracture can only be accomplished by visual inspection and expert interpretation of the radiograph [14]. The lack of a gold standard for a definition of vertebral fracture makes it difficult to assess the true incidence of vertebral fractures. Previous cross-sectional and retrospective studies have suggested a similar prevalence of vertebral fracture in Asians and Caucasians [15–19] despite their lower hip fracture www.selleckchem.com/products/idasanutlin-rg-7388.html rates [20]. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed Cepharanthine fracture risk assessment algorithms (FRAX®) to provide 10-year probabilities of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fracture (clinical spine, hip, humerus and forearm) based on a clinical risk factor profile and country-specific fracture and death incidence. The most complete models available are from the UK, Sweden, Japan and the US since the epidemiology of the relevant fractures is established [21]. However, the FRAX® models for some other countries (France, Spain, Italy, Turkey, Mainland China Hong Kong, etc.) are based on hip fracture

risk alone due to the lack of ethnic-specific data and use assumptions, i.e. the site of fracture ratios observed from the Swedish population, to derive the relevant risk functions for other major fractures including vertebral fractures [22]. The objectives of this study were (1) to report the incidence rates of clinical vertebral and hip fractures in a prospective cohort of Chinese men and women, (2) to compare the clinical vertebral and hip fracture rates with those of other ethnic groups, and (3) to evaluate whether a fracture prediction model that assumes a universal spine-to-hip fracture ratio may be biased. Methods Hong Kong This is the first prospective study of clinical vertebral fracture in an Asian population and is a part of the prospective Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study in which community-dwelling Southern Chinese men and women aged 50 or above were recruited from health fairs held in various districts in Hong Kong since 1995 [19, 23].