The omentum was then fixed to the mucosa of the luminal wall with Apoptosis inhibitor several endoscopic clips. The falciform ligament was used if a suitable omental patch was not available. If the NOTES procedure was unsuccessful,
either a laparoscopic or open omental patch repair was considered by the acute care surgical team [80]. Initial results from a laparoscopic-assisted NOTES approach for closure of perforated peptic ulcers appear promising Selleckchem LY2835219 and enable swift recovery in selected patients. This is especially important in elderly and/or immunocompromised patients. Technical details and patient selection criteria continue to evolve. We do not recommend NOTES approach for PPU treatment until further experience and clinical evidence is gained. Diagnosis and treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer (Dr. M. Bassi MD) Introduction Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is the most common gastroenterological selleck chemical emergency and has a considerable morbidity and mortality.
Management strategies have changed dramatically over recent decades due to the introduction of acid suppressive therapy, especially proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and endoscopic therapy. The incidence rates of UGIB demonstrate a large geographic variation ranging from 48 to 160 cases per 100 000 population [81–84]. Possible explanations for the reported geographic variation in incidence are: differences in definition of UGIB in various studies, population characteristics, prevalence of ulcerogenic medication, in particular aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prevalence. Some but not all time-trend studies Doxorubicin molecular weight have reported a significant decline in incidence of acute UGIB, especially peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB), in recent years. This decline is likely due to a combination of factors, including decreasing prevalence of gastric colonization with H. pylori, the use of eradication therapy in patients with ulcer disease, and the increased use of PPI therapy, both in general and in patients using aspirin and NSAIDs in particular [81, 85]. At the same time, an increasing proportion of patients presenting with UGIB are older and a significant
number of patients with UGIB consume NSAIDs and/or antiplatelet therapy to treat other medical comorbidities. Given these factors, UGIB continues to have a considerable impact with respect to patient morbidity and mortality, as well as health care resource utilization. The mortality rate of UGIB remains high somewhere between 7% and 14%. UGIB accounts for > 300 000 annual hospitalizations in the United States, with an estimated cost of $ 2.5 billion [86–88]. The majority of deaths do not directly result from exsanguination, but are related to poorly tolerated blood loss and resultant shock, aspiration, and therapeutic procedures. As such, mortality from UGIB is strongly associated with advanced age and presence of severe comorbidity.