“There is no in situ evidence hitherto for a modulation by


“There is no in situ evidence hitherto for a modulation by ATP of the glutamatergic excitatory transmission onto medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the rat striatum. In order to resolve this question, we used the patch-clamp technique in brain slice preparations to record excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by intrastriatal electrical stimulation and applied N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) to activate transmembrane currents of MSNs. In the absence of external Mg2+. ATP caused a higher maximum inhibition

of the EPSCs than adenosine. Only P1 (A(1)), but not P2 receptor antagonists interfered with the effects of both ATP and adenosine. Moreover. A(1) receptor antagonists click here were less potent in blocking the inhibition by ATP than that by adenosine. Eventually, adenosine deaminase (ADA) almost abolished the adenosine-induced inhibition, but only moderately decreased the ATP-induced inhibition. Antagonists of A(1) receptors (but not of P2 receptors) counteracted the depression by ATP of the current responses to exogenous NMDA, without altering those to AMPA. It is suggested that ATP indirectly, via its degradation product

adenosine, stimulates presynaptic inhibitory A(1) receptors situated at glutamatergic nerve terminals of striatal afferents; these nerve terminals are devoid of P2 receptors. However, ATP, in contrast to adenosine, also activates postsynaptic A(1) receptors at the MSN neurons

themselves. The resulting negative Selleckchem Combretastatin A4 interaction with NMDA receptors requires localized extracellular catabolism of ATP by ectonucleotidases. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Little is known about the molecular characteristics of pediatric brainstem gliomas (BSG), which continue to have a dismal prognosis. Targeted molecular strategies are limited due to rarity of biopsy BSG specimen coupled with obstacles associated with the analyses ZD1839 cell line of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) autopsies. The objective of this study was to develop methodologies to successfully identify the proteome profile from these archived FFPE specimens. Peptides were extracted from both tumor and adjacent normal FFPE brainstem specimen and quantified using O-18 proteolytic labeling strategy and LC-MS/MS analysis. The ingenuity pathway analysis software was used to elucidate interactions amongst differentially expressed proteins. We identified 188 proteins of which 54 (29%) were found up-regulated (>= 1.5-fold) in BSG compared to normal sections. Of these, 15 (28%) proteins have previously been reported as potential biomarkers for supratentorial malignant gliomas, while the rest appear to be exclusive to pediatric BSG. Because the majority of differentially expressed proteins are unique to BSG, we conclude that pediatric BSG is distinct from supratentorial gliomas.

Comments are closed.