These instances of L-form induction and recovery closely mirror what we observe in Clostridium thermocellum. The destruction of the cell wall, or the failure to maintain it, may be representative of a cell struggling to keep or obtain the energy needed for survival. Once we determined that C. thermocellum L-forms were viable, we questioned why the cells would form an L-form rather than remain rod-shaped or form a spore. It seemed unlikely that L-forms Apoptosis inhibitor were deformed or unformed spores, as defects in spore formation manifest in identifiable stages, none of which resemble the L-form. We therefore hypothesized

that L-form formation provided some advantage for C. thermocellum. One potential explanation is that transitioning to an L-form requires less energy than sporulation or conserves energy overall for the cell. It is also possible that L-forms provide some advantage over spores or rod-shaped cells in terms of survival or recovery. Testing the first scenario effectively would have been technically difficult, so we went about testing the second hypothesis. To compare spores, rod-shaped cells, and L-forms in terms of survivability and recovery, we tested how well each cell type tolerated heat

and how quickly each could resume growth. C. thermocellum spores proved to be much better at tolerating heat stress than L-forms or rod-shaped cells suggesting advantages for C. thermocellum spores in prolonged survival under other stressful conditions.

L-forms did not survive heat stress as well as spores, but did exhibit a shorter lag-phase upon recovery when compared with both spores learn more and stationary phase cells, each of which took MEK inhibitor over 9 hours EPZ5676 molecular weight longer to begin exponential growth. While L-forms demonstrated faster recovery, L-form viability over time was consistent with that of stationary phase cells when subjected to prolonged starvation. This suggests that the primary advantage for C. thermocellum in forming an L-form does not lie in enhanced viability over time, but rather in the ability to recover rapidly when conditions become favorable for growth. This feature may allow for L-from cells to out-compete other non-growing cells in natural environments.What molecular or physiological triggers come into play to determine whether a cell becomes spore, an L-form or remain rod shaped remain to be explored. Conclusions In this work we were able to define conditions that gave rise to either spores or L-forms in C. thermocellum ATCC 27405. Of particular interest is the formation of spores in response to changes in substrate. This result suggests that C. thermocellum has a preference for continued cultivation on one substrate and variations in substrate supplied during cultivation may need to be minimized in order to optimize growth. To our knowledge this is the first documentation of the L-form state in C. thermocellum, and the first comparison between spores and L-forms in one organism.